This article undertakes a genealogical analysis of the concept of freedom elaborated by the Czech philosopher Jan Patočka. It particularly examines the relevance of the insights contained in the incomplete project of the Negative Platonism, elaborated around 1953. In this seminal work, Patočka endeavors to illuminate a “negative” path for philosophical discourse, one that embraces the character of the negative, not as negation but as distancing. Through a nuanced reconceptualization of Plato’s chorismós and Husserl’s epoché, Patočka argues how this “positive negativity” illuminates the very structure of the experience of freedom. This article discusses how the theoretical impetus of the Negative Platonism gained considerable momentum in Patočka’s 1970s reflections. During these years, the idea of freedom acquired a more pronounced ethical-political dimension, primarily through its interaction with the concept of Pólemos. It then advances the hypothesis that, at this stage, Patočka’s understanding of freedom became indissociable from the notion of responsibility. A connection crucially elaborated in correspondence with his prominent engagement in the dissident experience of Charta 77. By analyzing the intricate constellation of concepts surrounding Patočka’s notion of freedom, this article ultimately aims to demonstrate the enduring relevance of this paradigm for interpreting our present.
Sofia Elena Merli (Wed,) studied this question.