Network meta-analysis evaluates sleep quality improvements from non-pharmacological interventions in older adults, suggesting tailored approaches.
Sleep problems are common among older adults and are associated with a wide range of adverse health outcomes. Concerns about pharmacological treatments have increased interest in non-pharmacological interventions; however, evidence comparing their relative effectiveness remains limited. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating non-pharmacological interventions in adults aged ≥ 60 years published between 2000 and 2024 were included. Network meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models to estimate standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). P-scores were used to rank the efficacy of interventions. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024521492). Thirty-four RCTs involving 3078 participants and 21 interventions were included. Eleven interventions significantly improved sleep quality. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia plus positive mood strategies (CBT-I+) showed the largest effect (P-score = 0.99, SMD = − 3.32, 95% CI − 4.59 to − 2.06), followed by cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) (P-score = 0.92, SMD = − 2.18, 95% CI − 3.04 to − 1.31). Subgroup analyses indicated that music therapy (MUS) was more effective among participants with PSQI < 10 (SMD = − 1.25, 95% CI − 1.85 to − 0.65), whereas CBT-I+ showed greater effects for those with PSQI ≥ 10 (SMD = − 5.48, 95% CI − 6.80 to − 4.16). By intervention setting, traditional Chinese health-promotion exercise (TCHPE) was more effective in home-based settings (SMD = − 1.55, 95% CI − 2.60 to − 0.50), whereas CBT-I+ showed greater effects in non-home settings (SMD = − 3.31, 95% CI − 4.57 to − 2.06). CBT-I+ was associated with the greatest improvements in sleep quality among older adults, particularly those with baseline PSQI ≥ 10 and in non-home settings. MUS showed greater benefits among older adults with baseline PSQI < 10, and TCHPE showed greater benefits in home-based settings. These findings support stratified, context-specific intervention selection. Given the low GRADE certainty, these results should be interpreted with caution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: