A secondary analysis investigates the impact of phosphatidylcholine on trimethylamine N-oxide in healthy adults, revealing minimal cardiovascular risk implications.
Egg-derived phosphatidylcholine may support the maintenance of cognitive function. However, its metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide is considered a potential cardiovascular risk factor. The present study aimed to assess, for the first time, the effects of long-term intake of egg-derived phosphatidylcholine on serum trimethylamine N-oxide concentrations in healthy Japanese middle-aged and older adults. A secondary analysis was conducted using preserved serum samples obtained from a previous randomized controlled trial (UMIN000041554). The study population, comprising thirty-two healthy middle-aged and older Japanese adults, was categorized into four groups based on their level of phosphatidylcholine intake: placebo (0 g/day), low-dose (0.3 g/day), medium-dose (1.0 g/day), and high-dose (3.0 g/day). Serum trimethylamine N-oxide concentrations were measured before and after the 12-week intervention. In the high-dose phosphatidylcholine group, serum trimethylamine N-oxide concentration increased significantly at 12 weeks (Week 12) compared with Baseline (Week 0) (P = 0.028). In contrast, no significant between-group differences were observed in serum trimethylamine N-oxide concentrations or in the magnitude of change from Baseline to Week 12, including comparisons with placebo. Across all groups, mean trimethylamine N-oxide values remained substantially below the threshold associated with high clinical risk. Twelve weeks of egg-derived phosphatidylcholine supplementation did not result in serum trimethylamine N-oxide concentrations approaching clinically concerning levels under the specific conditions tested. These findings suggest that egg-derived phosphatidylcholine may serve as a dietary source of choline without inducing a substantial elevation in trimethylamine N-oxide in healthy middle-aged and older adults. Confirmation of these results in studies with larger sample sizes is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: