PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 27, 20260 citations

An analysis of the JAGB method from the perspective of the asymptotic giant branch evolution

View Full Paper
CGC. GavettiPVP. VenturaFDF. Dell'Agli

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze the J luminosity function (JLF) and its connection to the star formation history of the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds.
  • Studied the J region of the color-magnitude diagram for LMC and SMC stars.
  • Employed population synthesis based on stellar evolution and dust formation models.
  • Adjusted physical assumptions related to red giant and asymptotic giant branch phases to achieve model-observation alignment.
  • JLF of the LMC peaks at expected J magnitudes for relevant stars.
  • SMC shows a shift in J fluxes to higher magnitudes, indicating an older population with lower mass progenitors.
  • Carbon stars identified as key sources within the J region, affecting the evolutionary analysis.

Abstract

The JAGB method has been proposed over the last years as a possible distance indicator for the galaxies in the Local Group and possibly beyond. The nature of the stars populating the J region, as well as the conditions of the star formation history and the structural properties of the galaxies for the straight application of this method, still need to be investigated. We studied the populations of the J region of the colour-magnitude rm (J-K, J) plane of the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds (LMC and SMC, respectively) to relate the shape of the J luminosity function (JLF) to the details of the formation histories of the two galaxies. Our aim is to try and distinguish the general aspects of the JLF to those more sensitive to the stellar population of the specific galaxy considered. We used a population synthesis approach, based on the combined results from stellar evolution and dust formation modelling, to find the expected distribution of the stars within the J region. We then compared the outcome with results derived from observations of LMC and SMC stars. Some physical assumptions, mostly related to the modelling of the red giant branch (RGB) and asymptotic giant branch (AGB) phases of stars, were tuned until a satisfactory agreement between the expectations from synthetic modelling and the observational evidence was reached. The sources observed within the J region were characterised as stars that recently reached the C-star stage and have not yet accumulated the extremely large amounts of carbon required to make the evolutionary track to evolve off the J region. Generally speaking, ̊m 2-3 M_⊙ stars stay within the J region longer, while lower mass objects evolve there for at most a couple of inter-pulse phases. The analysis of the JLF of the LMC, peaking at the J magnitudes expected for these stars, confirms this understanding. In the SMC, the distribution of the J fluxes is shifted to higher J magnitudes when compared to the LMC, which we interpret as the signature of a generally older population, with lower mass progenitors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gavetti et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a1352fed1d949a99abec4fhttps://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202557743/pdf
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Reconnaissance with JWST of the J-region Asymptotic Giant Branch in Distance Ladder Galaxies: From Irregular Luminosity Functions to Approximation of the Hubble Constant2024 · 42 citations
  2. 2Resolved Near-infrared Stellar Photometry from the Magellan Telescope for 13 Nearby Galaxies: J-region Asymptotic Giant Branch Method Distances2024 · 8 citations
  3. 3Resolved Near-infrared Stellar Photometry from the Magellan Telescope for 13 Nearby Galaxies: JAGB Method Distances2024
  4. 4The miniJPAS survey: Evolution of luminosity and stellar mass functions of galaxies up to z ∼ 0.72024 · 5 citations
  5. 5A new population of stars between the LMC and the MW revealed by post-AGB stars2023