Conceptual analysis explores narrative legitimacy's role in achieving victory in modern asymmetric conflicts, emphasizing its importance.
This conceptual research article develops a theoretical framework termed Narrative Consolidation Theory (NCT) to explain how durable victory in modern warfare is achieved through narrative legitimacy rather than material superiority alone. Drawing on the critical social theory of Michel Foucault, Pierre Bourdieu, Antonio Gramsci, Judith Butler, Bruno Latour, and others, the study integrates discourse theory, symbolic capital, affect theory, and memory studies to reconceptualize warfare as simultaneously kinetic, discursive, affective, and mnemonic. Through comparative interpretive analysis of asymmetric conflicts, the article argues that political victory stabilizes only when justificatory narratives achieve institutionalized legitimacy across domestic and international audiences. The paper contributes to International Relations theory, critical war studies, and political sociology by proposing Narrative Consolidation Theory as a multi-layered explanatory model of historical victory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanvir Ferdous (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: