Key result
Survey reveals ~87% of HCPs recognize residual ASCVD risk, highlighting inadequately addressed systemic inflammation.
Why the study?
Few surveys have focused on the patient journey or healthcare professionals perspectives in treating inflammation in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
What are the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals regarding unmet needs and the role of systemic inflammation in managing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease?
What are the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals regarding unmet needs and the role of systemic inflammation in managing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease?
There is a recognized unmet need in ASCVD management, with both patients and healthcare professionals acknowledging persistent symptoms and residual risk, highlighting the potential importance of addressing systemic inflammation.
Highlights unmet needs in ASCVD inflammation control despite standard care; leaves open value of targeted therapies pending RCTs.
Few surveys have focused on a patient’s journey or healthcare professionals’ (HCPs’) perspectives in treating inflammation in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Patients with ASCVD (n=200) and HCPs (n=204) completed separate 30-minute, online questionnaires between 6/24 and 8/24. HCPs included cardiologists (83%) and cardiology NPs or PAs (17%). Patients that completed the survey, however, were not linked to the HCP’s that participated. Among patients with ASCVD, HCPs reported initiation rates of statin and antiplatelet therapy at 78% and 65%, respectively. Only a limited number of patients (18%) believed their treatment was working extremely well, with 82% reporting persistent symptoms, including chest pain (28%), issues walking (28%), or issues breathing and/or cough (26%). Most HCPs (87%) believed that residual cardiovascular risk remained after modifying traditional ASCVD risk factors. Two-thirds (66%) of HCPs agreed that inflammation is an important component in ASCVD, not sufficiently addressed by current treatments and only 58% reported being mostly to extremely satisfied with current ASCVD treatments. Approximately 29% of cardiologists reported that they measured high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) often or always, and of those, 79% did so due to the presence or suspicion of an inflammatory comorbidity. Uncertainty exists about the evaluation and treatment of inflammation in patients with ASCVD. Ongoing studies evaluating anti-inflammatory therapies will help to inform future hsCRP testing in the ASCVD population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weber et al. (2026) studied this question. Only 18% of ASCVD patients believed treatment worked extremely well, 87% of HCPs saw residual risk, and 66% agreed inflammation is insufficiently addressed.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: