Cycle-2 of the SΔϕ series shows how consciousness and sleep regulate persistence without collapse, suggesting new frameworks.
This paper opens Cycle-2 of the Sofience–Δϕ (SΔϕ) series by formalizing maintenance modes that regulate Δϕ persistence under irreversibility. If time is treated as an interpretive output of Δϕ (T = H_T(Δϕ)), and if closure corresponds to Δϕ → 0 (collapse of experience/time as a re-entry phenomenon), then consciousness and sleep can be modeled as complementary operational modes: Consciousness is defined as a Δϕ persistence regulator: it maintains non-zero Δϕ by mismatch detection, unresolved-state maintenance (closure delay), and transition-path redistribution. Sleep is defined as a Δϕ maintenance mode: it reorganizes irreversible traces, reduces drift, lowers future coherence cost, and prevents lock-in to closure attractors. Sleep is treated as maintenance rather than termination. A minimal mode-switch condition is proposed: transition into sleep occurs when the slope of continued coherence cost exceeds the slope of maintenance/reset cost. The document intentionally excludes neuroscientific mechanisms and clinical guidance, fixing only minimal functional axioms for persistence without collapse. It concludes with an exit question toward the next item: whether pain should be modeled as maintenance failure signaling or as the cost of resisting closure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sofience (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: