Longitudinal analysis reveals that environmental innovation enhances performance in the agri-food sector, suggesting a need for strategic shifts.
The agri-food sector is vital to economic development, but it exerts significant environmental and social pressures. This study draws on the Natural Resource-Based View. It investigates the strategic sustainability-performance nexus in the global Food & Beverage industry using a longitudinal dataset (2013-2023) of 633 firms across the EU, US, and China. The multivariate analysis provides novel evidence on the "substance over symbol" debate, revealing a critical dichotomy: while environmental innovation acts as a dynamic capability enhancing ESG scores, green revenues alone do not guarantee superior ratings, exposing a gap between product-level metrics and systemic integration. Empirical findings indicate that financial markets value tangible innovation inputs, specifically R&D and operational efficiency, but do not directly reward ESG scores. This suggests investors prioritize innovation substance over formal disclosure. These findings underscore the need for a strategic shift from mere reporting compliance toward innovation-led sustainability to enhance market value. For policymakers, the results indicate that incentives should prioritize structural R&D and eco-innovation capabilities rather than superficial green labelling to align competitiveness with environmental objectives more effectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bernardo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: