Analysis of Tibetan interpretations of the darśanamārga in the Abhidharmasamuccaya, suggesting new insights.
While investigating a certain line of thought in the Yogācāra treatment of the darśanamārga, I had to deal with the exposition of this subject in the Abhidharmasamuccaya (mṄon pa kun btus = AS) ascribed to Asaṅga. In addition to the Indian commentary, viz. the Abhidharmasamuccaya-bhāṣya ascribed to one Jinaputra by the Tibetan tradition, there are several autochtonous Tibetan commentaries on the AS. In the present paper, I shall limit myself to a discussion of Bu ston's commentary on the passage, and to a provisional one at that. The other Tibetan commentaries will be referred to only occasionally. In: Contributions on Tibetan and Buddhist Religion and Philosophy (Proceedings of the Csoma de Körös Symposium held at Velm-Vienna, Austria, 13–19. September 1981, Vol. 2), E. Steinkellner and H. Tauscher (eds.), Wien 1983, 259–274.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lambert Schmithausen (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: