Introduces a governance architecture that enhances safeguards in agentic systems, addressing vulnerabilities in extraction-attack pathways.
Frontier AI systems exhibit a structural asymmetry: capabilities transfer through distillation and extraction, but safeguards do not. This asymmetry enables extraction-attackpathways in which model capabilities are recoverable while governance constraints vanish. This paper presents a unified substrate-layer governance architecture that resolves this asymmetry. I introduce constitutive governance as a non-distillable substrate for agentic systems, map detection-engineering grammar to governance-physics semantics, and formalize the failure geometry that emerges when bounded representational channels encounter unbounded state. Together, these components provide a practical map for engineering teams to instantiate governance architectures tailored to their systems and threat models, including extraction-attack scenarios similar to those observed in recent frontier-model incidents. The result is a discipline-level framework for building agentic systems whose safeguards persist across training regimes, operational contexts, and adversarial transformations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Narnaiezzsshaa Truong (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: