What question did this study set out to answer?

This document aims to establish consensus standards for interpreting and processing cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) images to improve diagnosis and report quality.

January 1, 2013Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceOpen Access

Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post Processing

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

This document aims to establish consensus standards for interpreting and processing cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) images to improve diagnosis and report quality.
Developed by the Task Force for Post-Processing of SCMR
Updated original recommendations from 2013
Discussed pitfalls of CMR image analysis
Established requirements for qualitative and quantitative evaluation of CMR images
Outlined standardized post-processing techniques
Highlighted the need for agreement to improve reproducibility of CMR reports

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

May support standardized CMR interpretation now; leaves open prospective validation of clinical impact.

Cite This Study

Schulz‐Menger et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a1a8a9aa2c73b01c0ae6e0 https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429x-15-35

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post Processing

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post Processing

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider