PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Energy Research & Social Science0 citationsOpen Access

Critical mapping of the energy-gender nexus: From “sex disaggregation” to “doing gender equality”

View Full Paper
HJHarshavardhan JatkarSBSarah BradshawKCKarla Cedano

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the interaction between gender and energy to promote gender equality.
  • Systematic review of literature published from 1991 to 2021
  • Conducted a quantitative bibliometric mapping of concepts and methods
  • Performed a qualitative analysis of selected studies through a critical gender lens
  • Increase in publications, though dominated by quantitative methods
  • Gender often treated as synonymous with biological sex
  • Limited engagement with critical gender theories noted, reinforcing stereotypes
  • Some studies using feminist or queer perspectives enrich energy research

Abstract

Existing energy research is frequently criticised for its lack of gender sensitivity and for reproducing masculine biases. While literature exploring energy and gender is growing, there remains a significant gap in understanding how these fields precisely interact. Exploring this intersection is important to advance the agenda for gender equality in energy research, policy and practice. This article presents a systematic review of papers published on the topic from 1991 to 2021, employing a novel two-stage interdisciplinary approach: a quantitative bibliometric mapping of literature, concepts, and methods, followed by a qualitative analysis of selected studies through a critical gender lens. The results reveal that while publications are increasing, the field is dominated by quantitative methods and often treats gender as synonymous with biological sex, failing to engage with critical gender theories. Importantly, the review highlights that energy–gender research is often conducted by scholars with limited engagement with gender theory, leading to research that frequently reinforces, rather than challenges, gender stereotypes. A small number of studies adopting feminist or queer perspectives illustrate how alternative theories of gender can enrich energy research. Considering these limitations, we argue for the advancement of a transformative energy agenda by shifting from analyzing sex-disaggregated data to “doing gender equality”. We conclude with eight procedural and thematic recommendations, including the necessity of interdisciplinary teams that include gender scholars, the adoption of qualitative methods to capture lived experiences, and a commitment to challenging gender stereotypes and incorporating alternative gender theories within energy research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jatkar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a285da0a974eb0d3c00c5ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104615
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Pro-environmental attitudes of users and non-users of fuelwood in a rural area of Greece2013 · 52 citations
  2. 2Characteristics of indoor air pollution and estimation of respiratory dosage under varied fuel-type and kitchen-type in the rural areas of Telangana state in India2018 · 106 citations
  3. 3Queer Fire: Ecology, Combustion and Pyrosexual Desire2018 · 79 citations
  4. 4It’s gender Jim, but not as we know it … A critical review of constructions of gendered knowledge of the Global South2019 · 5 citations
  5. 5Fuelwood Consumption and Forest Degradation: A Household Model for Domestic Energy Substitution in Rural India2000 · 333 citations