Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cavitand-MXene photocatalyst nanocomposite shows improved degradation of nevirapine, indicating effective photocatalytic properties.
A cavitand-MXene photocatalyst nanocomposite was fabricated through a self-assembly route. The pristine, S-scheme heterojunction, MXene-based heterojunction, and cavitand-MXene photocatalysts' properties and structures were successfully ascertained by spectroscopic and microscopic techniques. Data generated by these techniques revealed that the cavitand-MXene composites exhibited better electrochemical, optical and photocatalytic properties. These were attributed to lower charge transfer resistance, prolonged electron lifetime, and weak photoluminescence intensity. The cavitand-MXene photocatalyst composite (CWTC-5) demonstrated the least charge transfer resistance with 96.50 Ω and a decreased PL intensity compared to pristine and binary photocatalysts, ascribed to the efficient segregation of the electron and hole pairs. The photocatalytic performance of the cavitand-MXene composite (CWTC) on the degradation of nevirapine was superior relative to both pristine, binary, and ternary materials. Degradation pathways of nevirapine were derived from LC-MS/MS analysis, of which six major fragments were deduced, with m/z 74 being the smallest, assigned to C 4 H 11 N. Quenching studies confirmed the role of both hydroxyl and superoxide charge carriers to be responsible for the degradation of nevirapine. • CB [7] was successful added to the Ce 2 S 3 /WO 3 @TiVC to form Ce 2 S 3 /WO 3 @TiVCTx-CB [7]. • Ce 2 S 3 /WO 3 @TiVCTx-CB [7] present an excellent photoelectrochemical properties. • Ce 2 S 3 /WO 3 @TiVCTx-CB [7] present a better degradation of NVP than other catalysts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sithole et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: