PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

MEPs elicited by multidirectional rotational-field TMS show marked differences compared to unidirectional Figure-of-8 and H7 coils

View Full Paper
OSOrit Wonderman Bar SelaSGSharon GevaGPGaby S. Pell

Key Points

  • This research investigates the differences in motor evoked potentials elicited by multi-directional versus unidirectional TMS coils.
  • Healthy adults received TMS using Figure-of-8 and H7 coils alongside a novel dual H-coil system in random order.
  • MEPs were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle after stimulation with each coil configuration.
  • Resting motor thresholds were measured for each configuration to assess neuronal activation.
  • Multidirectional rfTMS elicited larger MEPs compared to unidirectional udTMS coils.
  • rfTMS demonstrated lower resting motor thresholds than the Figure-of-8 and H7 coils.
  • Findings suggest rfTMS recruits larger populations of neurons than traditional methods.

Abstract

Unidirectional transcranial magnetic stimulation (udTMS; e.g., via Figure-of-8 coil) depolarizes mainly neurons whose axonal orientation aligns with the direction of the induced electric field. A novel dual H-coil (T360°) TMS system (BrainsWayTM, Israel) generates a rotational magnetic field aimed to recruit a larger neuronal population by induction of a multidirectional electric field (rfTMS). This study aimed to comparatively assess the neurophysiological properties of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle following udTMS (via Figure-of-8 and H7 coils) vs. multidirectional rfTMS. In this study, 10 healthy adult subjects received TMS via the three coil configurations in a random order. The results showed that rfTMS elicited larger MEPs at a lower resting motor threshold (rMT) compared to the unidirectional coils. These findings suggest that rfTMS is likely to recruit larger populations of neurons compared to conventional udTMS coil configurations. This may be advantageous in efforts to enhance motor recovery following brain damage by treatments using TMS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sela et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a286370a974eb0d3c00faahttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343725
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Lego System for Conditional Inference2006 · 935 citations
  2. 2Phase and power modulations on the amplitude of TMS-induced motor evoked potentials2021 · 39 citations
  3. 3Rank-Normalization, Folding, and Localization: An Improved Rˆ for Assessing Convergence of MCMC (with Discussion)2020 · 1,646 citations
  4. 4Thirty years of transcranial magnetic stimulation: where do we stand?2017 · 103 citations
  5. 5Predicting Recovery Potential for Individual Stroke Patients Increases Rehabilitation Efficiency2017 · 205 citations