Randomised trial shows bepranemab's safety and biomarker effects in participants with progressive supranuclear palsy, suggesting a potential treatment path.
Background Preclinical evidence suggests targeting the mid-region of tau as a viable therapeutic strategy in diseases such as progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP): a rare, fatal, neurodegenerative tauopathy with no currently approved treatments. Bepranemab is a recombinant, humanised, full-length immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody binding to a mid-region tau epitope. We assessed safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of bepranemab in participants with PSP. Methods PSP003 ( NCT04185415 ), a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1b study, recruited participants in hospital settings across 13 centres. Participants (aged ≥40 years) met Movement Disorder Society-PSP criteria for possible/probable PSP, could walk ≥5 steps with minimal/no assistance and were stable on treatment for ≥2 weeks prior to baseline. Participants were randomised 3:1 to receive intravenous bepranemab (90 mg/kg) or placebo every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Primary endpoint: incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) from baseline to last visit. Results Twenty-five participants were enrolled (male: 44%; bepranemab n=18, placebo n=7). Seventeen (94.4%) in the bepranemab group reported ≥1 TEAE (five participants; ten investigational medicinal product (IMP)-related TEAEs), versus placebo (n=7; 100%). In the bepranemab and placebo groups, respectively, three participants (16.7%) and one participant (14.3%) discontinued due to TEAEs. Incidence of IMP-related TEAEs and severe TEAEs was similar between groups; no deaths were reported. Reduction (80.41%) in mean free tau cerebrospinal fluid levels was observed in the bepranemab group. Conclusions Multiple doses of bepranemab 90 mg/kg were well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile in participants with PSP. High target occupancy was observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Höglinger et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: