Dissertation evaluates nanopore sequencing for accurate bacterial genome analysis, suggesting implications for outbreak tracking.
Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing offers real-time, long-read capabilities for pathogen genomics, yet concerns persist regarding its accuracy in critical applications like outbreak tracking. This dissertation evaluates ONT-based workflows for genome reconstruction, high-resolution genotyping, and molecular characterization, presenting a scalable, reproducible bioinformatics pipeline for bacterial whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Genome reconstruction and ONT specific error patterns were investigated across a diverse panel of zoonotic and healthcare-associated pathogens, including Bacillus anthracis, Brucella spp., and Klebsiella spp. Results show that assembly with Flye followed by Medaka polishing (using bacteria-specific models) provides the highest accuracy. However, persistent biases in homopolymer-rich, high-GC, and methylated regions highlight a continued need for algorithmic improvements. Regarding genotyping, both cgMLST and SNP-based approaches were assessed. Despite ONT's higher error rate, optimized long-read workflows reliably reconstructed outbreak clusters. Furthermore, in silico serotyping of Salmonella enterica with nanopore sequencing data showed high concordance with classical assays. The framework’s utility was demonstrated via a case study of Streptococcus uberis outbreaks in Thuringia. The analysis identified a resistance-carrying plasmid linked to bovine mastitis, a feature only resolvable through ONT sequencing. Despite these advantages, ONT’s evolving hardware, chemistry, and neural network-based basecallers introduce reproducibility challenges, particularly for rare taxa underrepresented in training datasets. This work underscores ONT’s strong potential as a standalone platform for rapid, field-deployable analysis of pathogen genomics, while emphasizing the need for continued benchmarking and careful consideration of sequencing biases in epidemiological applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christine Thomas (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: