Observational study evaluates the albumin-to-prealbumin ratio as a prognostic marker in elderly sepsis patients, suggesting its clinical relevance.
Background: Serum albumin and prealbumin are increasingly recognized as biomarkers of inflammation rather than nutritional status. Because prealbumin responds more rapidly to acute inflammatory and catabolic stress than albumin, the albumin-to-prealbumin ratio (APR) may better reflect inflammatory burden. However, its prognostic significance in elderly patients with sepsis remains unclear. Methods: This single-center retrospective observational study included 84 patients aged ≥75 years hospitalized with sepsis between April 2023 and March 2024. APR was calculated using serum albumin and prealbumin levels at admission, and patients were categorized into low- and high-APR groups based on the median value. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the independent association between APR and 28-day mortality after adjustment for the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, maximum serum lactate level, and Mini Nutritional Assessment–Short Form. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to median serum albumin level (<2.9 vs. ≥2.9 g/dL). Results: Twenty-eight-day mortality was significantly higher in the high-APR group than in the low-APR group (40.5% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.001), with significantly poorer survival (log-rank p = 0.003). A high APR remained independently associated with increased 28-day mortality (odds ratio 10.2, 95% confidence interval 2.3–45.1). In subgroup analyses, APR was associated with mortality only among patients with relatively preserved albumin levels. Conclusions: APR is a useful prognostic marker of 28-day outcomes in elderly patients with sepsis and may provide prognostic information beyond conventional severity indices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: