Public Involvement in the Evaluation of Local Government Public Health Interventions in the UK: Lessons From PHIRST Insight.

Georgina Kathryn Wort; Hannah Robinson; Chloe Forte; Hannah Littlecott; Jemma Hawkins; Rona Campbell; Patricia Jessiman

doi:10.1111/hex.70618

April 1, 2026

Public Involvement in the Evaluation of Local Government Public Health Interventions in the UK: Lessons From PHIRST Insight.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

This research aims to explore how public involvement can enhance the evaluation of local government public health interventions.
Public partners contributed to study design.
Data collection materials were developed and refined with public input.
Topic guides were co-created to ensure relevance.
Public involvement significantly improved the study design.
Collaboration led to more relevant evaluation tools.
Feedback from public partners enhanced data collection processes.

Implication

The study evaluates local health interventions, involving public partners, suggesting improved collaboration is essential.

Abstract

Our public partners, Christina Stokes, Sian Harding, Rashmi Kumar and Barbara Harrington, made significant contributions to the study design and data collection materials (developing and refining the topic guides) developed for this study.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Wort et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a286600a974eb0d3c01450 https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70618

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Public Involvement in the Evaluation of Local Government Public Health Interventions in the UK: Lessons From PHIRST Insight.

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Public Involvement in the Evaluation of Local Government Public Health Interventions in the UK: Lessons From PHIRST Insight.

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading