PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026BMJ Open0 citationsOpen Access

Acceptability and adoption of a multiparameter point-of-care testing (POCT) device in primary healthcare for non-communicable diseases in resourced-limited communities in Peru

View Full Paper
CHCarlos A Huayanay-EspinozaUniversidad Peruana Cayetano HerediaDMDulce MoránUniversidad Peruana Cayetano HerediaLALeonardo Albitres-FloresUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia

Key Points

  • To evaluate the acceptability and adoption of multiparameter POCT devices for managing non-communicable diseases in Peru's primary healthcare.
  • Conducted a qualitative case-control process evaluation.
  • Engaged 63 participants including patients, healthcare professionals, and laboratory staff.
  • Implemented POCT in four facilities while maintaining conventional diagnostics in four control sites.
  • Gathered perceptions on acceptability, facilitators, and barriers to implementation.
  • Patients and healthcare workers valued POCT for speed and comfort but expressed concerns about accuracy.
  • Urban healthcare facilities showed better performance compared to rural ones in staff availability and operational hours.
  • Calibration issues were noted that affected the reliability of both POCT and conventional tests.
  • Effective communication among staff enhanced patient confidence in POCT, while inconsistent training posed reliability concerns.
  • Sustainability of POCT in rural settings requires improvements in supply chains, training, and quality assurance.

Abstract

Objectives To assess the acceptability and adoption of multiparameter point-of-care testing (POCT) devices for the diagnosis and management of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) at the primary healthcare level in a resource-limited region of Peru. Design Qualitative case-control process evaluation. Setting Eight primary healthcare facilities in northern Peru, including both urban and rural centres, where routine chronic care and laboratory services are provided. Participants Sixty-three participants: 36 patients, 12 laboratory technicians, 10 healthcare professionals and five facility heads. Eligible patients were ≥18 years, residing in the catchment area, with or without prior NCD diagnoses. Healthcare workers, including physicians, nurses, laboratory staff and facility managers. Interventions Multiparameter POCT devices were installed in four intervention facilities, accompanied by staff training and community awareness activities, while four control facilities continued with conventional laboratory diagnostics. Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcome: perceptions of patients and healthcare workers regarding the acceptability and adoption of POCT devices. Secondary outcomes: identification of facilitators and barriers to implementation, including infrastructure, supply chains and training gaps. Results (1) Individuals: POCT was valued for speed and comfort, but concerns over accuracy were mentioned. (2) Intervention characteristics: laboratory staff valued POCT’s practicality in emergencies, but noted limitations in handling multiple samples. (3) Outer setting: urban centres outperformed rural facilities, with more staff and longer operating hours. (4) Inner setting: calibration gaps impacted POCT and conventional test reliability, requiring quality control and training. (5) Process: clear staff communication boosted patient confidence in POCT, but inconsistent training could lead to reliability doubts. Conclusions Multiparameter POCT devices show promise for enhancing NCD care in resource-limited primary healthcare settings, particularly in rural areas. However, their sustainability depends on broader health system reforms, including reliable supply chains, expanded training and stronger quality assurance mechanisms. Further research should examine strategies for embedding POCT within national regulatory and policy frameworks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Huayanay-Espinoza et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a286a70a974eb0d3c01c7dhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104570
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper