A scoping review examines the acceptability of cardiovascular disease diagnostics in primary care, suggesting useful insights for future implementation.
Background and Aims Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading global cause of death, with 80% of deaths occurring in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). Improving access to screening and early diagnosis is essential. Point‐of‐care testing (POCT), which provides rapid results near the patient, is particularly valuable in resource‐limited settings. While POCT has been successfully implemented for infectious diseases like HIV and TB, investment in CVD‐focused POCT remains limited. This scoping review maps global evidence on the acceptability of CVD POCT, guided by the World Health Organization's REASSURED criteria, to inform future implementation strategies. Methodology This review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost databases. A preliminary search confirmed feasibility. Two reviewers independently screened studies at all stages, with agreement assessed statistically. The quality of included studies was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018. Results Out of 738 articles identified, 13 primary studies conducted in primary care settings were included. Themes emerging from the review included POCT availability, influence on triage and clinical decision‐making, ease of use, sample volume, and feasibility. Only two studies were randomized controlled trials; the rest were observational, mostly comparing POCT accuracy to central laboratory testing. Inter‐reviewer agreement was high (Kappa = 0.92), and MMAT scores ranged from 71.4% to 85.7%. Conclusions CVD POCTs are generally acceptable and demonstrate strong potential for clinical integration. However, a lack of robust evidence on patient outcomes, particularly from LMICs, limits the establishment of their effectiveness. More randomized controlled trials and economic evaluations in LMICs, where the burden of CVD is highest, are needed to support broader implementation and inform global strategies to reduce the impact of CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moswete et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: