Key result
Cardiovascular screening in LMICs identifies high cardiometabolic risk but fails to ensure linkage to care.
Why the study?
Although screening is essential for cardiovascular disease prevention and early detection, its effectiveness and implementation in low- and middle-income countries remain unclear.
Do cardiovascular disease screening programs improve detection and linkage to care in adults in low- and middle-income countries?
Systematic Review
Yes
Do cardiovascular disease screening programs improve detection and linkage to care in adults in low- and middle-income countries?
Cardiovascular screening programs in LMICs successfully identify high rates of undiagnosed cardiometabolic risk, but their overall impact is severely limited by poor linkage to care and high patient attrition.
Screening identifies risk in LMICs but linkage failures limit impact; extends need for trials of integrated care models.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading global cause of mortality and disproportionately affects low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although screening is essential for prevention and early detection, its effectiveness and implementation in LMICs remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance, detection yield, and linkage-to-care outcomes of CVD and major cardiometabolic risk-factor screening programs in LMICs. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO, CRD420251241426). Databases were searched through November 2025. Observational and interventional studies assessing cardiovascular or major cardiometabolic screening programs in LMICs were included. Primary outcomes were detection rates and linkage to care. Secondary outcomes included risk-factor control, cardiovascular events, mortality, and cost-effectiveness. Owing to heterogeneity, results were synthesized narratively. RESULTS: Seventeen studies from Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, and Latin America were included. Screening approaches comprised risk-prediction models, point-of-care testing, community health worker-led programs, and mobile health platforms. Diagnostic performance ranged from area under the curve 0.64 to 0.91. Locally adapted risk models generally outperformed imported scores, whereas simplified tools showed acceptable discrimination. Screening identified a substantial burden of undiagnosed disease, with up to 55% meeting hypertension criteria and approximately 40% classified as high risk for diabetes. However, considerable attrition occurred across the care cascade, with preventive service uptake ranging from 15% to 58% and confirmatory testing as low as 22%. Community health worker-led programs demonstrated >90% sensitivity and specificity compared with clinician assessment. CONCLUSIONS: CVD screening programs in LMICs can effectively identify unmet cardiometabolic risk, but weak linkage to care limits impact. Strengthening integrated screening-to-treatment pathways is essential to improve outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jamileh et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Cardiovascular disease and major cardiometabolic risk factors. Cardiovascular disease screening programs vs. Usual care, alternative screening strategies, or no formal comparator was evaluated on Detection rates and linkage to care. Cardiovascular screening programs in LMICs effectively identified unmet cardiometabolic risk, but weak linkage to care and high attrition across the care cascade limited their clinical impact.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: