Demonstrates MAMBA + improves malware detection in dynamic analysis, suggesting stronger defenses against obfuscation.
In this paper, we focus on the robustness of behavior-based malware analysis models, justified by the need to address the high mutation rates of malware executables that debilitate conventional signature-based approaches and even behavior-based AI solutions. In response to these challenges, we propose MAMBA + , an obfuscation-resistant dynamic analysis approach tailored for uncovering malware behavior. We have assembled a comprehensive collection of behavioral obfuscation attacks designed to undermine behavior-based models. The central concept behind MAMBA + involves treating obfuscated calls as perturbed data and introducing a novel loss function to effectively balance ground-truth predictions and the handling of these perturbations. To facilitate this approach, MAMBA + designs adapted embedding mechanisms to transform traces of API calls into high-dimensional vectors for attention calculations. Through a comprehensive empirical study with seven obfuscations and three unseen attacks, we reveal important qualitative properties of MAMBA + , and quantitatively demonstrate its superiority in performance and robustness to all compared methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: