Analyzes right-wing epistemology through the lens of historical trilemmas, revealing its flaws.
While pseudoscience and science denial have long been associated with fringe political movements, in recent years, both have become more strongly associated with right-wing ideologies. Within the same time period, political views once regarded as fringe have become increasingly influential, particularly within the politics of the USA. This paper discusses an attempt by a notable figure associated with the “alt-right” and “Christian Nationalism” to develop a general epistemological approach aligned with the broader ideology. This paper examines one attempt to apply the approach to a historical question in epistemology (the Munchhausen or Agrippan Trilemma) and discusses the ways in which this approach fails in multiple ways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Camestros et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: