PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Philosophy of Science0 citationsOpen Access

Pragmatist Realism about Causation

JDJason A. DeWitt

Key Points

  • The central aim is to evaluate the relationship between pragmatist accounts of causation and perspectivalism.
  • Critical evaluation of Price's arguments about perspectivalism.
  • Analysis of Woodward's causal view.
  • Development of a pragmatist realist perspective on causation.
  • Price's argument is shown to rely on an unacceptable premise.
  • A pragmatist realist view of causation is proposed that maintains objectivity.
  • Ismael's perspectivalist stance remains compatible with the proposed realism.

Abstract

Abstract Some philosophers argue that pragmatist accounts of causation require accepting perspectivalism—the view that causation depends on an agent’s perspective. This paper critically evaluates this inference by examining Price’s arguments for perspectivalism and against Woodward’s view. I demonstrate that Price’s positive argument rests on an unacceptable premise, and drawing on Woodward’s work, I propose a pragmatist realist view of causation that survives Price’s criticisms. This pragmatist realism identifies causes through human concerns and practices, but treats the causal relation as objective and independent of agential perspectives. The paper concludes by showing Ismael’s perspectivalist view is consistent with pragmatist realism.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jason A. DeWitt (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a286eb0a974eb0d3c02371https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2026.10201
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper