Commercial trial examines rice bran’s effectiveness as a wheat bran alternative in poultry feed, suggesting economic benefits for farmers.
Purpose Poultry sectors in many developing economies face persistent feed cost pressures due to their dependence on imported ingredients. Using Ghana as a case study, this research aims to examine whether locally-sourced rice bran can be elevated from an underutilized by-product to a cost-effective feed ingredient that strengthens farm profitability and reduces import dependence. Design/methodology/approach A 42-week commercial-scale randomized controlled trial evaluated four rice bran inclusion levels against a wheat bran control diet. Daily production, egg quality traits, feed costs and revenues were captured using standard farm accounting procedures. Profitability was assessed using gross margins, supported by deterministic price-sensitivity analysis modeling the effects of varying feed and egg prices. Findings Formulations containing 25–30% rice bran matched the control in egg output and egg-quality characteristics while lowering feed costs by 9.5–11.4%. The 30% inclusion level yielded the highest returns, increasing gross profit margins by 5.4 percentage points. Sensitivity analysis showed that high-inclusion feed remained profitable under adverse market conditions, whereas the control and low-inclusion feed formulations were less profitable. Research limitations/implications Broader adoption requires addressing rice bran's perishability and validating performance across agroecological zones, farm sizes and feed processing systems. Originality/value This study offers rare long-cycle, commercial-scale evidence from West Africa demonstrating the economic viability of agro-waste valorization in poultry feed and presenting a practical, theory-informed model for advancing import substitution while improving farm-level profitability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boso et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: