This retrospective study reveals 62% six-month survival in burn patients initially admitted to non-burn ICUs, suggesting a need for better care strategies.
Background and Objectives: Many burn patients are initially admitted to non-burn center intensive care units (ICUs) due to resource constraints, geographic barriers, or delayed transfer. Their management requires multidisciplinary, phase-specific clinical and assistive practices, yet outcomes from non-specialized centers remain scarce. This study aimed to (1) determine six-month survival among all adult burn patients initially admitted to a non-burn center ICU, (2) identify clinical predictors of mortality, and (3) explore reasons for transfer to burn centers within a resource-limited healthcare setting. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study including 42 adult burn patients initially admitted to the ICU of a regional non-burn hospital in Romania (2019–2024). Of these, 24 were treated entirely in the non-burn center (initially treated in the ICU and then further managed on the same hospital’s wards), and 18 were, after initial ICU stabilization, subsequently transferred to burn centers. Six-month survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations with mortality. Clinical trajectories and transfer decisions were also analyzed. Results: Six-month survival was 61.9% (95% CI 48.8–78.5), with most deaths occurring within 60 days. Total body surface area (TBSA) (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02–1.08, p < 0.001) and acute kidney injury (AKI) (HR 3.48, 95% CI 1.18–10.29, p = 0.024) were independently associated with mortality. Patients transferred to burn centers had greater TBSA (median 35% vs. 15%, p = 0.003), consistent with severity-driven referral decisions. Conclusions: Among all burn patients initially admitted to a non-burn center ICU, six-month survival was 62%, with TBSA and AKI independently associated with mortality in adjusted analyses. These findings underscore the importance of phase-specific, multidisciplinary care pathways, including early resuscitation, renal and hemodynamic monitoring, coordinated nursing care, rehabilitation planning, and transfer protocols to improve outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grăjdieru et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: