Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental investigation reveals that chitosan-derived inhibitors enhance shale recovery in drilling, suggesting a sustainable alternative.
With the increasingly stringent environmental regulations, the development of high-performance and eco-friendly shale inhibitors for water-sensitive formations has become an urgent priority. Chitosan, a renewable biopolymer derived from chitin, has inherent potential as a shale inhibitor but is limited by low water solubility and suboptimal inhibition efficiency. To overcome these limitations, cationic quaternary ammonium groups were grafted onto chitosan through etherification with 3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyltrimethylammonium chloride (CHA), yielding chitosan quaternary ammonium chloride (QASC). Systematic evaluation through linear swelling, rolling recovery, and bentonite inhibition tests revealed QASC’s superior performance. Notably, 1% QASC reduced bentonite swelling to 28.1% after 16 h, outperforming 5% KCl (48.2%) and 1% polyetheramine (41.1%). Remarkably, QASC achieved 88.4% shale recovery at 150 °C significantly exceeding the values for polyetheramine (52%) and pure water (13.2%). Mechanistic analysis revealed that QASC inhibits clay hydration through dual mechanisms: (1) electrostatic and hydrogen-bond mediated adsorption on clay surfaces, effectively neutralizing surface charges and diminishing hydration films; (2) intercalation into clay interlayers to create a physical barrier against water invasion. This synergistic combination ensures stable inhibitory performance under elevated temperatures. Given its enhanced biodegradability, QASC emerges as a sustainable alternative to conventional inhibitors, effectively addressing the dual challenges of technical performance and environmental compatibility in shale gas drilling operations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: