Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multicenter cohort study reveals efficacy and toxicity of CAR-T in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma, suggesting external validation of previous findings.
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy revolutionized treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL). Real-world efficacy and toxicity data are needed as clinical trial populations are often not representative. Hence, we conducted a multi-center retrospective study of patients with R/R FL undergoing commercial CAR-T with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) between 2021 and 2024. Endpoints included measures of efficacy (overall response rate [ORR], complete response rate [CRR], progression-free survival [PFS], and overall survival [OS]) and toxicity (rates of cytokine release syndrome [CRS] and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome [ICANS]). Among 136 patients, 100 (74%) received axi-cel and 36 (26%) received tisa-cel. Axi-cel patients were younger (median age 60 vs 68 years, p=0.001) and received bendamustine lymphodepletion less often (9% vs 33%, p<0.001). Median follow up was 14.4 months (range 0.8 - 72.0 months). In the unweighted analysis, axi-cel was associated with higher ORR (96% vs 80%, p=0.007), CRR (88% vs 71%, p=0.024), and longer median PFS (30.5 months vs 11.9 months, p=0.021) compared with tisa-cel. Median OS did not differ significantly between the two products (not reached vs 23.6 months, p=0.061). Rates of CRS were comparable (75% vs 75%, p=0.99), whereas ICANS occurred more frequently with axi-cel (42% vs 17%, p=0.008). After inverse probability of treatment weighting, efficacy outcomes were largely similar between axi-cel and tisa-cel, however, axi-cel remained associated with significantly higher toxicity. In real-world settings, both axi-cel and tisa-cel demonstrated efficacy in patients with R/R FL, although PFS was inferior to that reported in clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharp et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: