Introduction: cigarette smoking is a major source of systemic oxidative stress and a well-established risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are increasingly promoted as reduced-risk alternatives, yet their cellular effects remain incompletely understood. Methods: this study compared the oxidative stress-mediated effects of conventional cigarette smoking and HTP use on human erythrocytes. Erythrocytes from healthy non-smokers, conventional smokers, and HTP users were analyzed using biochemical, functional, and cytological approaches to assess redox status, membrane and cytoskeletal organization, anion exchanger 1 (AE1) function, antioxidant response, and redox-sensitive signaling pathways. Results: conventional smokers exhibited higher intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, thiol depletion, methemoglobin and hemichrome formation, whereas HTP users showed marked lipid peroxidation despite lower ROS availability. Both groups instead displayed altered expression and distribution of key membrane and cytoskeletal proteins, including glycophorin A, AE1, spectrin, ankyrin, and band 4.1, indicating impaired membrane–cytoskeleton interactions. Functional analyses revealed an accelerated AE1-mediated anion exchange in erythrocytes from conventional smokers, whereas cells from HTP users exhibited a reduced sulfate accumulation, indicating altered transport capacity. In both groups, G6PDH activity was significantly increased, and redox-sensitive signaling pathways involving ERK, AKT, and eNOS were activated, accompanied by sex-dependent alterations in estrogen receptor expression and distribution. Conclusions: collectively, these findings identify erythrocytes as sensitive biomarkers of tobacco-related systemic damage and indicate that smoking-induced erythrocyte dysfunction, including that associated with HTP use, may actively contribute to vascular impairment. This evidence challenges the assumption that heated tobacco products confer a substantially reduced cardiovascular risk compared with conventional cigarettes.
Spinelli et al. (Wed,) studied this question.