Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluation shows non-clinical ownership improves patient care and staffing in English general practices, suggesting sustainability benefits.
Ownership of English general practices by physicians has been declining for many years and concentrated among fewer physicians. Non-clinical ownership may provide a sustainable alternative structure for general practice. In this study, we provide the first formal evaluation of non-clinical ownership in an English general practice setting. We compile a comprehensive dataset of general practices across eight years between 2015/16 and 2022/23 from a range of sources to investigate the impact of non-clinical ownership stakes on key primary care outcomes, including staffing levels and turnover, patient satisfaction, access, quality of care, reimbursement for non-core services and total patient list size. Employing a dynamic event study design combined with propensity-score weighting, we find practice manager partners increase direct patient care (excluding physicians and nurses), administrative staff numbers, reimbursement for non-core services and total patient list size. However, we find no statistically significant effect on any other outcome. Offering equity stakes to non-physician staff may support practice sustainability by allowing alternative ownership structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Urwin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: