Overview identifies advancements in iron energy utilization, emphasizing dual pathways and future integration strategies.
Under the vision of carbon neutrality, the global energy system urgently requires storable, transportable, and tradable zero-carbon carriers. Iron, due to its high crustal abundance, low cost, environmentally friendly reaction products, and ease of closed-loop cycling, is being reconsidered as a potential “metallic energy” alternative to fossil fuels. This paper systematically reviews the conceptual evolution, scientific lineage, and paradigm shift logic of iron-based energy within the framework of dual pathways: combustion and electrochemistry. On the combustion front, a multi-level understanding has been established—ranging from microscopic reaction mechanisms to macroscopic flame propagation, and from unit combustors to diversified thermal power systems—laying a methodological foundation for an integrated “solid fuel–thermal–power” approach. In parallel, the electrochemical pathway has developed both liquid and solid routes, integrating energy storage, pollution control, and resource recovery within a single device through multi-valent redox reversibility, thereby expanding the concept of generalized energy storage under the “battery-as-factory” paradigm. Current research is shifting its focus from single performance metrics toward synergistic optimization of efficiency, lifespan, cost, safety, and environmental impact, marking a transition in technological paradigm from “material trial-and-error” to “mechanism design.” Looking forward, to advance iron energy beyond the experimental validation stage, it is imperative to establish a cross-scale, closed-loop scientific characterization system, develop recycling strategies with low entropy and low energy consumption, and deeply integrate with renewable electricity, hydrogen, and high-temperature heat sources to form spatiotemporally transferable zero-carbon energy systems. In this way, iron may integrate into global energy trade as a “metallic energy in specific scenarios like ports/islands,” offering a scalable, hydrocarbon-independent technological option for achieving carbon neutrality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: