Survey research reveals mechanization enhances employment and health but not education or food security.
This study examines the social effects of agricultural mechanization on crop output in North Central Nigeria, specifically assessing the impact of employment generation, education opportunities, health and safety, and food security. A survey research design was adopted, and primary data were collected from 384 respondents across Benue, Nasarawa, and the Federal Capital Territory using a structured questionnaire. The validity of the research instrument was established through content and construct validity, with exploratory factor analysis confirming a cumulative variance of 66.937%. Reliability tests yielded a Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of 0.833. Binary logistic regression was employed for data analysis, with statistical significance assessed at the 5% level. The results indicate that employment generation significantly influences crop output (B = 1.950, p = 0.021, Exp(B) = 7.026), underscoring the role of mechanization in creating job opportunities that enhance productivity. Health and safety also show a statistically significant effect (B = 0.565, p = 0.022, Exp(B) = 1.760), suggesting that improved working conditions and healthcare access contribute to increased agricultural efficiency. However, education opportunities (B = 0.265, p = 0.294) and food security (B = 0.420, p = 0.087) do not exhibit significant effects on crop output. The study concludes that while mechanization positively impacts employment and health conditions, its effects on education and food security require further investigation. It recommends policies promoting mechanization-driven employment, improved health and safety conditions, long-term agricultural education strategies, and enhanced food security mechanisms to ensure sustainable agricultural growth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Victoria Nanen Kwaghgba (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: