PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026European Radiology3 citationsOpen Access

Transradial versus transfemoral neuroangiography in a tertiary pediatric hospital—a propensity score matched study

KFKin Fen Kevin FungCPCarmen Parra-FariñasVRVanessa Rea

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the feasibility and safety of transradial access with transfemoral access in pediatric neurovascular procedures.
  • Retrospective cohort analysis of 729 pediatric procedures from 2020 to 2024.
  • 175 procedures utilized transradial access (TRA), and 540 used transfemoral access (TFA).
  • Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to adjust for baseline differences.
  • Primary outcomes were technical success rates and adverse events; secondary outcomes included radiation dose and procedure duration.
  • Technical success rates were similar: TRA 98% vs TFA 99% (p > 0.99).
  • TRA showed a higher vasospasm rate (7% vs 1%, p = 0.03) but a lower rate of hematoma formation (2% vs 9%, p = 0.03).
  • Fluoroscopy time was longer in the TRA group (19.4 min vs 8.8 min, p < 0.001), but radiation dose and procedure time were similar.
  • Asymptomatic radial artery occlusion occurred in 5.1% of TRA cases.
  • A sheath-to-artery ratio ≥ 1 increased the odds of radial artery occlusion (OR 6.13, p = 0.02).

Abstract

Abstract Objective To evaluate the feasibility and safety of transradial access (TRA) in comparison to transfemoral access (TFA) in pediatric neurovascular procedures. Materials and methods In this single-center retrospective cohort study, 729 pediatric neurovascular procedures performed between January 2020 and December 2024 were reviewed, including 175 TRAs and 540 TFAs. Primary outcomes included technical success and adverse events, while secondary outcomes assessed radiation dose, fluoroscopy time, and procedural duration. Propensity score matching (1:1) was applied to adjust for imbalance in baseline covariates. Statistical significance was defined at p 0.99). TRA was associated with a higher rate of vasospasm (7% vs 1%, p = 0.03) but a lower rate of hematoma formation (2% vs 9%, p = 0.03). Despite the longer fluoroscopy time in the TRA group (19.4 min vs 8.8 min, p < 0.001), the radiation dose and procedural time were comparable between both groups. Asymptomatic radial artery occlusion (RAO) was detected in 5.1% (9/175) of radial accesses. A sheath-to-artery ratio ≥ 1 was independently associated with RAO (odds ratio, 6.13; 95% CI: 1.32, 28.4; p = 0.02). Conclusion TRA is technically feasible for pediatric neurovascular procedures in a selected population. Further prospective studies should be performed to evaluate the mid to long-term outcome of patients with asymptomatic RAO. Key Points Question Despite widespread adoption in adult neurointerventional practice, evidence of transradial access (TRA) in the pediatric population remains limited. Findings TRA has a comparable technical success rate to transfemoral access (TFA) in a large cohort of neurovascular procedures in a selected pediatric population. Clinical relevance TRA is a technically feasible alternative to TFA for pediatric neurovascular procedures in a selected group of patients. Preprocedural ultrasound assessment of the radial artery and optimization of the sheath-to-artery ratio are essential for minimizing radial artery occlusion. Graphical Abstract

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fung et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a287f20a974eb0d3c03c64https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12391-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper