Validation study assesses MRI-based volumetric quantification of fatty infiltration in rabbits, suggesting improved reliability over conventional methods.
Backgrounds/Objectives: Fatty infiltration (FI) of rotator cuff (RC) muscles is a critical prognostic factor after surgical repair. While the Goutallier–Fuchs grading system is widely used, its reproducibility is often debated. This study aimed to validate a previously reported three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based volumetric quantification method by comparing it with histologic findings in a chronic rotator cuff tear (RCT) rabbit model. Methods: Eighteen shoulders from nine rabbits were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 6 each): repair (A), chronic tear (B), and control (C). In groups A and B, a chronic RCT model was established by detaching the supraspinatus tendon, with group A receiving repair after six weeks. At 12 weeks after repair, 7.0T MRI was performed, and volumetric quantification of intra-muscular fat was performed using semi-automated 3D Slicer software. Histologic fat proportion was measured via Oil Red O staining and ImageJ analysis. Results: The muscle weight and MRI-based muscle volume were significantly lower in group B than group C (p < 0.05). The radiologically measured fat proportion was significantly higher in groups A (1.8 ± 0.8) and B (2.8 ± 0.7) compared to group C (0.5 ± 0.4, p < 0.001). Histologic analysis showed a corresponding pattern (3.0 ± 1.2%, 5.2 ± 1.0%, 1.7 ± 1.0% for groups A, B, and C, respectively; p < 0.001). A strong positive correlation was identified between the radiologic and histologic measurements of FI (r = 0.784, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Direct histologic comparison validates the reliability of 3D MRI-based volumetric quantification for evaluating FI of the RC muscle in a chronic RCT rabbit model. This objective approach may address the inherent limitations of the conventional qualitative grading system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: