This retrospective observational study analyzes CT scan usage and abnormalities in children with mild head trauma, suggesting varied influencing factors.
Objective: To analyze the reasons for ordering a CT scan and the abnormalities identified in children with mild head trauma classified as intermediate-risk according to the PECARN rule. Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients aged 3 months to 14 years who presented to the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary hospital between 2021 and 2022 with mild head trauma classified as intermediate-risk. Two multivariable analyses were performed to identify demographic and clinical factors associated with CT scan utilization and CT abnormalities. Results: We included 555 patients; 40% were girls, and the median age was 4 years (interquartile range: 1 to 8 y). Most patients (98.6%) were managed as outpatients after a median ED stay of 4.5 hours (IQR: 4 to 6.75). CT scans were performed in 78 patients (14.1%), of whom 24 (30.8%) had abnormalities: 13 had traumatic brain injuries and 11 had isolated skull fractures. Six patients (1.1%) had clinically important traumatic brain injuries (ciTBI). Four independent factors were associated with CT scan utilization: number of vomiting episodes (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.16-1.49), headache (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.21-3.6), abnormal behavior reported by parents (OR: 3.45; 95% CI: 1.99-5.95), and time elapsed before being seen by an ED physician (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.01-1.08). Two factors were associated with CT abnormalities: younger age (OR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71-0.95) and severe injury mechanism (OR: 5.89; 95% CI: 2.04-18.37). Conclusions: In children with mild head trauma classified as intermediate-risk, the factors leading to CT scan utilization differ from those associated with CT abnormalities. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ortiz-Santiago et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: