Descriptive cross-sectional study examines health status in older adults, revealing social factors' influence on depression effects.
Purpose: This study aimed to examine the association between depression and self-rated health status among adults aged ≥65 years and to assess the moderating effects of key social variables.Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the ninth wave of the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging. Survey-weighted multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with self-rated health status. The moderating effects of formal social activities and subjective social status on the association between depression and self-rated health status were examined.Results: Data from 4,487 older adults were analyzed. Age, activities of daily living, and number of chronic diseases were significantly associated with self-rated health status. Higher levels of depression were significantly associated with lower odds of reporting good self-rated health status (odds ratio [OR]=0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.93~0.98). In contrast, greater participation in formal social activities (OR=1.42, 95% CI=1.29~1.56) and higher subjective social status (OR=1.57, 95% CI=1.45~1.71) were associated with higher odds of reporting good self-rated health status. Furthermore, significant moderating effects of formal social activity and subjective social status were observed, such that the association between depression and self-rated health status was attenuated and no longer statistically significant at higher levels of these variables (p>.05).Conclusion: This study examined factors associated with self-rated health status among community-dwelling older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2022 and explored the moderating roles of formal social activity and subjective social status in the association between depression and self-rated health status, thereby providing implications for research on older adult health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: