Harmonised land evaluation identifies suitable areas for agriculture and forestry, supporting sustainable land use in Portugal.
Harmonised land evaluation frameworks are essential for sustainable land planning and policy development. Assessing land suitability is crucial for predicting agricultural and forestry potential but also for mitigating land degradation risks. Current land suitability maps in Portugal vary greatly in scale and methodology. This study presents the first nationally consistent framework to produce a harmonised land suitability map for mainland Portugal at a 1:100,000 scale following a recently updated WRB soil map. The latter was obtained by integrating legacy soil data with delineated land units according to soil-forming factors (climate, lithology, and relief). These land units were used to derive key land qualities, subsequently classified into constraint levels. Following FAO land evaluation principles, four land suitability levels for agriculture and forestry were assigned to 125 land units across three representative areas in southern Portugal. Relief and lithology emerged as main drivers of land suitability. Marginal agricultural lands are largely dominant (65.1–78.0%), followed by non-suitable lands (14.8–28.3%). Forestry suitability is mostly confined to moderate (61.5–69.4%) and marginal (30.6–37.4%) classes, reflecting the higher adaptability of forestry systems. High consistency was observed between the derived suitability classes and the latest land use/land cover map of Portugal. The framework enables decision-makers to identify areas suitable for intensive production while safeguarding lands vulnerable to degradation. It also provides a transferable tool for adaptive landscape management and sustainable land allocation, supporting policy development under changing environmental conditions in Mediterranean regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guerreiro et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: