A cross-sectional survey assesses tobacco control policy support in Italy, suggesting strong backing among non-smokers.
Introduction This study assesses the Italian population's support for innovative tobacco control policies, which aims at reducing use of nicotine-containing products and exposure to secondhand smoke and aerosol. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2024 among a representative sample of 3125 Italian adults. We assessed support on banning tobacco sales to people born after a certain year (Smoke-Free Generation, SFG), raising the minimum age for purchasing tobacco to 21 years (Tobacco 21, T21), substantially increasing tobacco taxation, banning electronic cigarettes (e-cigarette) and heated tobacco products (HTP) in indoor public places and workplaces, and prohibiting tobacco and e-cigs advertising. Results Support for tobacco control policies was 67.0% for the SFG policy, 72.9% for the T21 policy, 61.5% for a tax increase, 80.8% for a ban on indoor e-cigarette and HTP use in public places and 81.7% in workplaces respectively, and 78.2% for an advertising ban for all nicotine products. Support for all policies increased with age (p-values for trend ranging from <0.001 to 0.037) and was significantly lower among current smokers (support ranging from 17.9% to 59.7%). E-cigarette users showed lower support for a SFG (32.4%) and advertising bans (41.4%), while HTP users were less supportive of all policies except the T21 policy (support ranging from 13.2% to 43.9%). Conclusion In Italy, strong public support exists for new tobacco control laws, especially among never smokers and non-users of novel products. However, also a considerable proportion of current smokers, e-cigarette and HTP users support these policies. Policymakers can confidently advance these strategies, while public campaigns should target less supportive groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Possenti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: