PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Energies1 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Evaluation of Anode Materials for Electrochemical Treatment of Anaerobic Digestate: Ammonia, Phosphorus, COD and Turbidity Removal

View Full Paper
SLShuoTian LiSPSankar Ganesh PalaniMOMaazuza Othman

Key Points

  • The research aims to compare the performance of various anode materials in removing nutrients from anaerobic digestate.
  • Evaluated five anode materials: Fe, stainless steel, Al, Zn, and Ti/RuO2–IrO2.
  • Used a single-cell hybrid electrocoagulation–electrooxidation system at a current density of 25 mA cm−2.
  • Conducted experiments with 0.5–1% NaCl to analyze nutrient removal effectiveness.
  • Al anodes achieved 92% phosphorus and 85% turbidity removal but only 24% ammonia removal.
  • Ti/RuO2–IrO2 anodes reached 86% ammonia removal at 1% NaCl but lower nutrient removal (≤61%).
  • SS and Fe anodes demonstrated moderate nutrient removal (≈52% P and 68% turbidity).
  • Zn showed selective phosphorus removal (70%) but limited performance in ammonia and turbidity reduction.

Abstract

This study assessed the performance of five anode materials (Fe, stainless steel (SS), Al, Zn, and Ti/RuO2–IrO2) in terms of the removal of ammonia, phosphorus, and turbidity from anaerobic digestate using a single-cell hybrid electrocoagulation (EC)–electrooxidation (EO) system, which enabled the simultaneous evaluation of EC and EO processes under identical conditions. Experiments were conducted at a current density of 25 mA cm−2 and 0.5–1% NaCl. Al anodes showed the highest phosphorus (92%) and turbidity (85%) removal, through electrocoagulation, while ammonia removal remained limited (24%). In contrast, Ti/RuO2–IrO2 anodes achieved high ammonia removal (up to 86% at 1% NaCl) via EO, but lower phosphorus and turbidity removal (≤61%). SS and Fe anodes provided moderate and comparable nutrient removal (≈52% P, 68% turbidity, and 32–37% ammonia), whereas Zn anodes were less effective, with selective removal (70%) in P in1 h but limited ammonia and turbidity removal. Ti/RuO2–IrO2 demonstrated high durability with minimal weight loss. These results highlight the critical role of anode material on the balance between EC and EO pathways, offering practical guidance for selecting electrode material for efficient electrochemical treatment of nutrient-rich effluents.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a288590a974eb0d3c0439ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/en19051190
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper