Why the study?
Whether a half-dose de-escalation strategy with potent P2Y12 inhibitors improves the net clinical benefit in Korean patients with ACS remains uncertain.
Does a half-dose de-escalation strategy of prasugrel or ticagrelor improve optimal platelet reactivity in Korean patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to conventional-dose clopidogrel?
Does a half-dose de-escalation strategy of prasugrel or ticagrelor improve optimal platelet reactivity in Korean patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to conventional-dose clopidogrel?
In Korean ACS patients, de-escalation to half-dose ticagrelor resulted in excessive platelet inhibition and lower optimal platelet reactivity compared to half-dose prasugrel or conventional clopidogrel, with increased minor bleeding.
Excessive platelet inhibition with half-dose ticagrelor cautions against de-escalation in Korean ACS patients; challenges dosing strategies and warrants outcome trials.
East Asians treated with potent P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor) generally experience more intense platelet inhibitory responses resulting in an increased risk of major bleeding. Whether a half-dose de-escalation strategy improves the net clinical benefit in Korean patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains uncertain. A total of 120 patients were pragmatically randomized to either prasugrel (n = 39, 60 mg loading dose (LD)/10 mg maintenance dose (MD)), ticagrelor (n = 40, 180 mg LD/90 mg MD), or clopidogrel (n = 41, 600 mg LD/75 mg MD) followed by a half-dose reduction at 1 month, or conventional dose 75 mg clopidogrel. The primary endpoint was the incidence of optimal platelet reactivity (OPR), defined as a P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value between 85 and 208 (by VerifyNow) at 3 months. Ticagrelor treatment achieved a significantly lower PRU compared with prasugrel and clopidogrel (31.0 ± 34.5 vs. 93.2 ± 57.1 vs. 153.1 ± 69.4), resulting in the lowest rate of OPR (12.5% vs. 48.7% vs. 63.4%). At 9 months, the minor bleeding was significantly higher with potent P2Y12 inhibitors than with clopidogrel (31.6% vs. 12.2%; HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.12-7.75). Only a few patients experienced ischemic complications. In Korean ACS patients, a de-escalation strategy with half-dose ticagrelor and prasugrel from standard dose increased the OPR rate significantly. Half-dose ticagrelor had a lower OPR rate and greater platelet inhibition compared with half-dose prasugrel as well as conventional-dose clopidogrel. Optimal dose reduction strategies for potent P2Y12 inhibitors require further investigation to balance safety and efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: