Key result
Random forest model predicts PE risk with ~0.77 AUC in stroke patients with DVT.
Why the study?
Risk factors for PE in stroke patients with DVT are poorly understood and routine CTPA screening is unfeasible, leading to underdiagnosis of this potentially fatal complication.
Can machine learning models accurately predict the risk of pulmonary embolism in stroke patients with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis?
Observational (n=337)
No
Can machine learning models accurately predict the risk of pulmonary embolism in stroke patients with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.774 for RFC vs 0.709 for Logistic Regression
Absolute Event Rate: 0.774% vs 0.709%
A Random Forest machine learning model utilizing 11 clinical features can effectively predict the risk of pulmonary embolism in stroke patients with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis.
May aid PE risk stratification in stroke patients with DVT; extends ML applications but requires external validation before adoption.
Background Up to 42% of stroke patients are susceptible to lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The dislodgment of thrombus in deep veins of stroke patients can develop into fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), which has insidious onset and high mortality rate, and the risk factors of PE in stroke DVT are not yet known by clinical staff, which makes it easy to be underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed. In addition, routine CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) cannot be performed for screening. In this study, machine learning technology was utilized to establish a fast and accurate screening model for pulmonary embolism in patients with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in stroke. Methods In this study, all patients admitted with stroke who developed lower extremity deep vein thrombosis from January 2019 to April 2024 were selected for retrospective study. Patient demographic information, medical history and comorbidities, clinical signs, laboratory indices, hospitalization, and medication were included in the analysis. LASSO regression was utilized for feature dimensionality reduction screening, models were constructed using five machine learning algorithms, and internal validation was completed. Oversampling was performed using the SMOTE algorithm as a way to address the problem of unbalanced sample proportions. Hierarchical k-fold, class weights, random search techniques, and self-stepping policy tuning were used to prevent overfitting and model optimization. Feature attributes were expressed numerically using SHAP. Results A total of 337 patients were enrolled in this study, of which, 24 patients developed pulmonary embolism. A total of 11 predictor variables were screened by LASSO regression to construct the model. Among the five machine learning models, the Random Forest Classifier (RFC) model exhibited the best performance, with its area under the curve (AUC) = 0.77, accuracy = 0.721, sensitivity = 0.918, precision = 0.750, and F1 score = 0.826, PR-AUC = 0.895, Brier score = 0.172.all of which were higher than those of the other models. The rankings of the SHAP features, from highest to lowest, were oxygen partial pressure, history of hypertension, D-dimer, serum creatinine, severe lung disease, time in bed ≥72 h, stroke type, heart failure, use of acid-producing drugs, chest pain, and dyspnea. Conclusion In this study, five machine learning models were established to assess the likelihood of pulmonary embolism in stroke patients with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, among which the RFC model performed the best. We can promptly recognize and assess patients at risk of PE based on their SHAP, take early preventive and therapeutic measures, and improve the prognosis of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Stroke patients with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (n=337). Random Forest Classifier (RFC) machine learning-based prediction model for pulmonary embolism risk vs. Other machine learning models including Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting Classifier, Multi-Layer Perceptron Classifier, Support Vector Machine Classifier was evaluated on Prediction of pulmonary embolism risk in stroke patients with lower extremity DVT (AUC 0.774 for RFC vs 0.709 for Logistic Regression). The Random Forest Classifier model predicted pulmonary embolism risk with an AUC of 0.774, accuracy of 72.1%, and sensitivity of 91.8% in stroke patients with lower extremity DVT, outperforming other machine learning models.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: