Objectives Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM)-milled glass fiber posts offer notable advantages. However, their performance compared to that of prefabricated, composite-reinforced glass fiber posts is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the fracture strength and fracture patterns of canine roots restored with relined glass fiber posts and CAD/CAM-milled glass fiber posts. Materials and methods In total, 20 decoronated canine roots underwent endodontic treatment ( n = 10). In the relined group (control), prefabricated glass fiber posts (Reforpost Angelus #1, Angelus, Brazil) were relined with a resin composite (Z350, 3M ESPE, USA). In the milled group, the root canal was modeled using a post (Pinjet, Angelus) and red acrylic resin (Pattern Bright Kit, Kota Ind., Brazil). The acrylic resin patterns were scanned and milled from a glass fiber block (Fiber CAD Post Core, Angelus). A dual-cure self-adhesive resin luting agent (RelyX™ U200, 3M ESPE) was used for post cementation in both groups. The specimens were subjected to compressive loading, applied at a 45° angle to the long axis of the tooth using a universal testing machine with 200 kgf of compressive force at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min, until failure. The failure mode was classified as catastrophic (fracture extended to the middle and/or apical third) or repairable (glass fiber post and/or coronal core or limited to the cervical region). A statistical analysis was performed using an independent samples t -test ( α = 0.05). Results A statistically significant difference was observed in the mean fracture strength, with higher values for the milled group ( p = 0.004). Furthermore, the milled group had fewer catastrophic failures. Conclusions The CAD/CAM-milled glass fiber posts exhibited greater fracture strength and a reduced incidence of catastrophic fractures.
Aguiar et al. (Thu,) studied this question.