Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validation experiments show improved accuracy in cross-modal retrieval using fine-grained features and new methods.
Cross-modal hashing retrieval faces fundamental challenges from modality-modality (M-M) and modality-label (M-L) inconsistencies inherent in multimodal data. Existing methods rely on coarse-grained disentanglement to address these inconsistencies, but suffer from inaccurate semantic separation and modality-common semantic information loss during cross-modal alignment. Through comprehensive analysis, we demonstrate that coarse-grained approaches fail to effectively alleviate modality inconsistencies. Our validation experiments show that incorporating fine-grained features yields up to $$6%$$ accuracy improvements over coarse-grained methods, confirming that fine-grained semantic components are critical for robust cross-modal retrieval. However, existing fine-grained methods require extensive pre-training and lack seamless integration into end-to-end frameworks. In this paper, we propose Inconsistency Alleviated Fine-Grained (IAFG) cross-modal hashing retrieval, a novel framework that enables semantic component-level disentanglement and alignment without extensive pre-training. Our approach introduces two key innovations: Semantic Component Disentanglement (SCD) that achieves fine-grained separation of modality-common and modality-unique information using learnable query vectors and competitive feature routing, and Fine-grained Semantic Alignment (FSA) that realizes accurate cross-modal alignment at the component level while preserving semantic details through component-level cross-attention and cross-modal triplet alignment. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance with significant improvements in retrieval accuracy across different modalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: