PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2026Critical Care0 citationsOpen Access

Prevalence and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OLOliver LimRLRyan Ruiyang LingVMVivien Mak

Key Points

  • To assess the prevalence and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest specifically in the intensive care unit (ICU).
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting ICU-CA in adults.
  • Searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases for relevant literature.
  • Performed random effects meta-analyses using a generalized linear mixed model.
  • Used Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for risk of bias assessment and GRADE approach for evidence certainty.
  • Conducted subgroup analyses based on variables like geographical region, study source, and COVID-19 status.
  • The pooled proportion of ICU cardiac arrest was 3.23% with moderate certainty.
  • ICU-CA prevalence was significantly higher in COVID-19 patients (10.6%) compared to non-COVID-19 patients (2.3%).
  • Pooled ICU mortality rate was found to be 74.0% and in-hospital mortality rate was 82.0%.
  • High proportion of shockable rhythm was inversely related to ICU mortality, but not to in-hospital mortality.

Abstract

Cardiac arrest in the intensive care unit (ICU-CA) is distinct from other in-hospital cardiac arrests, involving critically ill patients in monitored settings. Its prevalence and outcomes remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to fill this evidence gap and identify areas for future research to improve outcomes in this patient population. We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus databases from inception until 26 November 2025 for studies reporting on ICU-CA in adults. We performed random effects meta-analyses with the generalised linear mixed model. We used the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist to assess risk of bias and the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. The primary outcome was the prevalence of patients with ICU-CA; secondary outcomes included ICU and in-hospital mortality. We performed subgroup analyses based on geographical region (continent), study source (registry vs. non-registry), and COVID-19 status (infected vs. non-infected). We included 35 observational studies including 36 cohorts in the meta-analysis. The pooled proportion of ICU-CA was 3.23% (95% CI: 2.08–4.98, moderate certainty). The proportion of ICU-CA was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in patients with COVID-19 (10.6%, 95%-CI: 5.4–19.7) compared with non-COVID-19 cohorts (2.3%, 95%-CI: 1.5–3.5). Pooled ICU mortality was 74.0% (95%-CI: 63.7–82.1, moderate certainty) and in-hospital mortality was 82.0% (95%-CI: 75.9–86.9, high certainty). Meta-regression found that proportion of shockable rhythm was inversely associated with ICU mortality, but not in-hospital mortality. Cardiac arrest in the ICU was associated with poor survival, with a higher prevalence in patients with COVID-19. Future studies should focus on peri-arrest characteristics to guide prognostication and management of individuals who experience ICU-CA.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lim et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a3d7baec16d51705d2dfbchttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-026-05880-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper