Key result
Novel lipid indices link to cardiocerebrovascular disease, with AIP outperforming traditional markers.
Why the study?
Do novel lipid markers (NHHR, AIP, LAP) predict cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease risks better than traditional indices in adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=18,996)
Do novel lipid markers (NHHR, AIP, LAP) predict cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease risks better than traditional indices in adults?
Novel lipid markers, particularly the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), may be superior to traditional lipid indices in predicting cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease risk.
Dyslipidemia is central to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (CCVD). This study investigates associations of novel lipid markers – NHHR (non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio), atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), and lipid accumulation product (LAP) – with CCVD risks using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, comparing their predictive performance with traditional lipid and obesity indices. Data from 18,996 adults were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated associations of NHHR/AIP/LAP with hypertension, heart failure, coronary heart disease, angina, and stroke. Restricted cubic splines (RCSs) tested nonlinearity, receiver operating characteristic curves assessed predictive ability, and subgroup analyses examined heterogeneity. Fully adjusted models revealed significant associations of NHHR and AIP with hypertension, heart failure, coronary heart disease, angina, and stroke, while LAP showed no link to stroke. RCS indicated nonlinear NHHR-hypertension and NHHR-coronary heart disease relationships ( P for nonlinear < .05). AIP exhibited nonlinear associations with hypertension and stroke, while LAP demonstrated threshold effects for hypertension, coronary heart disease, and angina. Subgroup analyses identified interactions: sex and diabetes modified NHHR-hypertension associations ( P < .05); AIP-hypertension links varied by sex, education, smoking, and body mass index (BMI); LAP-hypertension associations differed by sex and BMI ( P < .05). NHHR, AIP, and LAP independently predict CCVD risks, with AIP showing optimal stability, surpassing traditional markers. Prospective studies are needed to confirm causality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Limei et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (n=18,996). Novel lipid markers (NHHR, AIP, and LAP) vs. Traditional lipid and obesity indices was evaluated on Hypertension, heart failure, coronary heart disease, angina, and stroke. Novel lipid markers NHHR, AIP, and LAP independently predicted cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease risks, with AIP showing optimal stability and surpassing traditional markers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: