Retrospective cohort study identifies C-reactive protein as a risk factor for remission failure in children with lupus nephritis, suggesting monitoring its levels.
Lupus nephritis (LN) is a serious complication that adversely affects the prognosis of children with systemic lupus erythematosus. However, short-term prognostic indicators for LN in this population remain unclear. This retrospective cohort study aimed to identify factors associated with treatment remission in Chinese children with LN, with a focus on inflammatory markers. We included 72 children aged 0 to 18 years diagnosed with LN at our center between January 2022 and December 2024. Partial remission was defined as a ≥50% reduction from baseline in proteinuria and to an absolute value of <3.0 g/g (300 mg/mmol), measured as the protein-to-creatinine ratio from a 24-hour urine collection, accompanied by stabilization or improvement in kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR, within ±10% to 15% of baseline). The non-remission group comprised patients who failed to meet the above partial remission criteria within the 8 to 24 week follow-up period. Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were significantly associated with failure to achieve remission (univariate hazard ratio 1.067, 95% CI: 1.011–1.126, P = .019; multivariate hazard ratio 1.075, 95% CI: 1.019–1.134, P = .008). A nomogram incorporating CRP demonstrated moderate discriminatory capacity for remission status at 24 weeks (AUC = 0.739). These findings indicate that baseline CRP is an independent risk factor for short-term remission failure in pediatric LN, suggesting that its monitoring may be beneficial for guiding clinical interventions. In conclusion, elevated CRP is an independent risk factor for short-term remission failure, and its monitoring may be beneficial for assessing treatment outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: