Longitudinal analysis reveals sleep duration and depression predict cancer risk in older adults, suggesting sleep health's importance.
Background/Aim: The present study aimed to investigate the association between sleep duration and the risk of newly-onset cancer among middle-aged and elderly adults, and to examine the effect of depression on this association. Patients and Methods: The data from 9,400 participants in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS, 2011-2020) were analyzed. Cox proportional hazards regression models, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, restricted cubic spline (RCS) regression, and threshold-effect analysis were employed to evaluate the relationship between sleep duration and cancer risk. Furthermore, subgroup analyses were conducted to explore potential heterogeneity across populations. Results: Over a median follow-up period of 9.0 years, 271 participants (2.9%) developed newly-onset cancer. Longer sleep duration was associated with a reduced risk of incident cancer [fully adjusted hazard ratio (HR)=0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.51-0.84]. RCS regression indicated a nonlinear association between sleep duration and the risk of cancer incidence (nonlinearity p=0.005), with an inflection point at 5.0 h of sleep per night. Specifically, sleeping ≥5 h per day was associated with an 18% lower risk of cancer (HR=0.82, 95% CI=0.74-0.91), whereas shorter sleep duration (<5 h) showed no significant protective effect. This protective effect of sleep was more pronounced among individuals with depression (HR=0.64, 95% CI=0.44-0.92). Subgroup analyses further revealed that the protective effect of sleep was stronger among men, urban residents, individuals without hypertension, and smokers. Conclusion: Longer sleep duration (≥5 h) is independently associated with a lower risk of newly-onset cancer in middle-aged and elderly adults, particularly in those with depression. These findings highlight the importance of sleep health for cancer prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: