This analysis evaluates forest map accuracy in the tropics, highlighting errors in forest cover estimation.
• An extraordinarily intensive ground verification effort allowed us to create highly accurate (92%) pantropical forest maps and to better estimate accuracies of seven relevant alternative datasets. • The compared maps showed large areas of disagreement (from 17% to 24% of the total 15 million ha analyzed), mostly related to recurrent overestimations of forest cover by the global maps. • Errors increased in regions prone to host reforestation or restoration activities; there ground verification methods combined with the critical use of forest maps are especially pertinent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weber et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: