This thesis investigates affective iconicity's influence on language processing, suggesting non-arbitrariness in linguistic meaning.
This thesis investigates the phenomenon of affective iconicity – a resemblance-based mapping between linguistic form and meaning in the affective domain – thereby challenging traditional notions of arbitrariness in language as being solely based on convention. Through a series of overall 11 studies involving 233 participants – presented across four publications (Conrad et al., 2022; Schmidtke & Conrad, 2018; Schmidtke & Conrad, 2024; Schmidtke et al., 2024) – and employing diverse methodologies, including subjective ratings, measures of response latencies, and neurophysiological recordings of event-related potentials (ERPs), this research demonstrates that both valence and arousal contribute to effects of affective iconicity, albeit via potentially different mechanisms with varying degrees of prevalence across the lexicon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Schmidtke (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: