PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2026Transforming Government People Process and Policy0 citations

Place branding (policies) and rural economic development in China: what impact and how?

View Full Paper
YZYingju ZhangAVAnna VisviziNHNa He

Key Points

  • The central aim is to investigate the effects of place branding policies on rural economic development in China.
  • Employ a time-varying difference-in-differences method to analyze data.
  • Examine the relationship between place branding strategies and rural economic development across different time periods.
  • Assess varying policy impacts using dynamic treatment effects.
  • Findings show that place branding policies significantly enhance rural economic development.
  • The analysis reveals different impacts of policies over various time periods.

Abstract

Purpose This article aims to explore the policy effects of place branding on rural economic development in China. Design/methodology/approach A time-varying difference-in-differences (DiD) method is used to validate the assumed positive relationship between place branding strategies and rural economic development in China. Findings The results demonstrate that place branding policies significantly enhance rural economic development. The dynamic treatment effect analysis further elucidates varying policy impacts across different periods. Research limitations/implications This study does not examine inter-brand interactions and their policy implications. Single-country case-study approach should also be mentioned. Practical implications The findings advocate for adopting place branding as a strategic pathway for rural economic development in China, while the findings are scalable. Originality/value The value added of this paper is threefold. First, it provides an insight into the place branding strategies in rural China, thus contributing to the overall, complex and expanding debate on place branding strategies. Specifically, it adds to the relatively underexplored domain of rural place branding in the Global South. Second, by empirically validating the positive effects of place branding policies on rural economic development in China, this paper provides the so far missing empirical insight into the question of how effective place branding policies/strategies in rural areas are and how they matter. Third, this study makes a major claim consistent with locating place branding and place branding strategies in context of public policy debate.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a3d8caec16d51705d2feb3https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-07-2025-0198
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Place branding as rural development policy in China: the case of Guangshan county2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Brand Credibility, Brand Consideration, and Choice2004 · 1,335 citations
  3. 3On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables2009 · 1,447 citations
  4. 4Supporting smallholders’ decision making: managing trade-offs and synergies for sustainable agricultural intensification2020 · 58 citations
  5. 5Technological innovation promotes industrial upgrading: An analytical framework2024 · 109 citations